Roopa Bains vs Ashlee Narker Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L L W W L L
Form
L W W W L L W L L LHead To Head: Bains 1 - 0 Narker
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bains winning 2 and Narker winning 0. The last match between Bains and Narker was at the W60 Canberra, 13-03-2023, Q3, Clay with Roopa Bains getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Roopa Bains | 1 |
| Ashlee Narker | 0 |
W60 Canberra(13-03-2023)
6
4
7
5
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Roopa Bains
Player
Ashlee Narker
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:40:0 | Average Match Time | 1:40:0 |
| 58% (38/66) | 1st Serve % | 61% (37/61) |
| 58% (22/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (19/37) |
| 43% (12/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (7/24) |
| 78% (7/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (5/9) |
| 57% (35/61) | Return Points Win % | 48% (32/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Roopa Bains Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Natalie Barbir
Player
Roopa Bains
44%
(
15 of
34)
1st Serve %
42%
(
14 of
33)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
53%
(
8 of
15)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
53%
(
18 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
36
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ya-Yi Yang
Player
Roopa Bains
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roopa Bains
Player
Ashlee Narker
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roopa Bains
Player
Sophia Fry
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
En Shuo Liang
Player
Roopa Bains
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lily Taylor
Player
Roopa Bains
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Roopa Bains
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Roopa Bains
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roopa Bains
Player
Tamara Bajagic
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
53)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Ashlee Narker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Ashlee Narker
48%
(
16 of
33)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Ashlee Narker
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Ashlee Narker
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
62)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
13
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashlee Narker
Player
Natsuho Arakawa
43%
(
35 of
82)
1st Serve %
48%
(
51 of
106)
0
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
13
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
50%
(
41 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
52 of
106)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Ashlee Narker
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stefani Webb
Player
Ashlee Narker
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ashlee Narker
Player
Nithesa Selvaraj
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashlee Narker
Player
Sara Nayar
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlee Narker
Player
Shannon Spencer
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
46%
(
34 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaylah Mcphee
Player
Ashlee Narker
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 42% (18/25) | Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) |
| 41% (38/55) | Sets Win/Loss | 43% (12/16) |
| 46% (377/436) | Games Win/Loss | 46% (112/133) |
| 39% (13/20) | Hard Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) |
| 50% (2/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) |
| 50% (3/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 42 | Aces Total | 7 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.45 |
| 134 | Total Double Faults | 54 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:26:36 |
| 283.3 | Average Opponent Rank | 438.85 |
| 58% (933/1611) | 1st Serve % | 58% (445/764) |
| 58% (545/933) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (245/445) |
| 42% (282/678) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (142/319) |
| 50% (94/188) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (49/94) |
| 44% (744/1701) | Return Points Win % | 45% (357/789) |
| 41% (15/22) | Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) |
| 50% (3/3) | Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 43% (18/42) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (5/12) |
| 75% (3/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 75% (6/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 89% (18/16) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (6/5) |
| 11% (18/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (6/1) |
| 8% (25/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (7/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
